![]() |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Fire Program Analysis (FPA) The Wildland Fire Leadership Council (WFLC) The Council is a cooperative interagency organization dedicated to achieving consistent implementation of the goals, actions, and policies in the National Fire Plan and the Federal Wildland Fire Management Policy. The Council provides leadership and oversight to ensure policy coordination, accountability, and effective implementation of the National Fire Plan and the Federal Wildland Fire Management Policy.
|
November 2006
The recommended architecture is responsive to the FPA vision, namely that FPA should represent “a common interagency planning and budget information system, with a cost-effective trade-off analysis incorporating land and resource management objectives”. Once fully developed and implemented, the FPA system will provide planning and budget support by displaying key efficiency, effectiveness, and performance measures for various budget scenarios and constraints, and by estimating costs for fire program components for each agency by Fire Planning Unit. The architecture for the FPA decision support system addresses three broad components: the FPA system should inform decisions by national budget leads and fire planners in formulating annual budget proposals and planning for budget allocations among fire program components by agency and Fire Planning Unit (FPU); the FPA system should also enable FPU-level analyses that inform decisions made by local agency fire program and resource managers regarding alternative allocations of fire program resources within the geographic area covered by the FPU; and the results or outcomes of these decisions at each level should be evaluated against five broad management concerns, formulated as a series of effectiveness, efficiency and performance measures, defined in an operationally appropriate manner at national and FPU levels. The effectiveness, efficiency and perfomance measures focus on: The WFLC requested a range of options be developed which provides more details regarding program benefits, tradeoffs between program components, and the proposed workload to field units, and operations and maintenance costs.
These options will be shared with the federal fire directors and their acting representatives. Their recommendations are being included in the materials being prepared for the next interagency Executive Oversight Group and the WFLC briefings. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||